AI AI AI MEANS AI NOT NI

by paul73 » 05 Sep 2010

IF SOMEONE HAS AI ON THERE PROFILE THEN THATS WHAT THEY WANT NOT AI BUT ILL TRY MY LUCK WITH NI.

THERES TO MUCH OF IT HAPPENING ON THESE SITES, THERES OTHER SITES FOR SEX IF THAT WHAT YOU WANT.

THE WOMAN HERE MIGHT BE DESPERATE BUT THATS NOT A REASON TO PUSH FOR NI. ITS A PERSONAL THING AND SHOULD BE A MUTUAL DECISION BETWEEN BOTH PARTIES.

AI MEANS AI

by HelenSarah » 10 Jan 2011

Hello there,
New to both this site and to the process of finding a donor, I was at the point of researching the AI/NI debate, or rather, whether there is any valid debate, as the insistence on NI is surely only to fulfil some kind of sexual fantasy (which I'm not taking issue with if it is clearly stated and mutually acceptable), and not because of any clinical evidence supporting NI as the most effective means of conception? I would be interested to hear all opinions on the subject and would appeal to anyone that may be misleading women for sex, to consider the fact that those women are vulnerable and to take advantage of them is weak and immoral, if not criminal.

by Lissa82 » 12 May 2012

I completely agree. Like myself, I suppose most women come here with the one and only purpose of trying to conceive a baby. Yes, sure there are some who will be ok with conceiving their babies in the "natural" way and good luck to them. But many of us are simply and ONLY wanting the other vital ingredient for baby-making; sperm! Not sex, not rumpy pumpy, not looking for a good time! JUST SPERM!!! If the men on these sites cannot get that then they should just leave and check out the other 200000000 web sites dedicated to sex! They might find their luck will improve greatly. So all you men on here trying to force yourselves onto women who want to have babies because you think they are easy, vulnerable targets.. THINK AGAIN!

by dtw » 30 May 2012

Since the law changes in the UK, there has been a massive reduction in donors through regulatory bodies due to new human rights issues, especially that of tracing history and other legal issues. As donors, we try to protect ourselves and our prospective recipients from the ridiculous changes that prevent good people from having a much deserved family. After all, we have made a huge decision to help others, to create a child we cannot parent, and we should not have to field derogatory messages as a result of that.
Recipients of sperm often converse by email and PM to discover as much as they can about the donor who offers his services. Inevitably there is a direct face to face meeting with the donors and recipients and this is where a child is conceived. But this is his child aswell as hers. He is ushered into a bathroom or other with a cup and the door is closed. Indignantly, this man sits there with the eagerly waiting audience waiting outside. As soon as the task is done, he is rushed out the door and out comes the turkey baster. OK, a little over simplified but essentially the facts. 

And to those donors who give in good faith, once the package leaves your possession, you have no control over who and how many receive your genetic material. Any agreements made would be uncontrolled and I really don't want some unexpected contacts or financial claim many years from now if I have not agreed to such.
A clinical and in my opinion, demeaning way to conceive MY child.
When you are offering out your womb for free, then the choice on how you are inseminated is yours.
Im very clear in my reasons and what to expect from me, do not tar us all with the same brush.
You are free to decide how your child is conceived, as am I.




Return to Sperm Donors in UK



cron

Are you looking for a Sperm Donor or Co-Parenting?

REGISTER NOW